eu-space-act

Art. 86(3)

Full text: this article's wording is third-party regulatory text. See the official source for the authoritative provision.

Mapped SPARTA techniques (11)

Techniques referencing this article

  • DE-0002.02Jam Link SignalST0006
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    86(3)(b)'s geographical-splitting-into-distinct-locations limits jamming impact when alternate ground sites can take over reception.

  • EX-0017Kinetic Physical AttackST0004
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Kinetic destruction is mitigated only through resilience — 86(3)'s redundancies and (b)'s geographical splitting into distinct locations (extended in spirit to constellation distribution) limits the per-strike impact on mission continuity.

  • EX-0017.01Direct Ascent ASATST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    Direct-ascent ASAT requires constellation-level redundancy as the only operator-side mitigation — within 86(3)'s redundancies and geographical-splitting framework.

  • EX-0017.02Co-Orbital ASATST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    Co-orbital ASAT is mitigated by constellation redundancy; 86(3)'s redundancies-of-network-and-information-systems clause is the operator-side resilience anchor.

  • EX-0018Non-Kinetic Physical AttackST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    Wide-area non-kinetic effects (EMP) require constellation/regional redundancy — 86(3)'s redundancies and geographical-splitting clause limits per-incident impact.

  • EX-0018.01Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP)ST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    High-altitude EMP affects multiple satellites within view — 86(3)'s constellation-redundancy and geographical-splitting clauses limit single-event mission loss.

  • EX-0018.02High-Powered LaserST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    Laser attacks affect single satellites at a time — constellation-level redundancy under 86(3) limits mission impact.

  • EX-0018.03High-Powered MicrowaveST0004
    addresses
    low
    direct

    HPM affects single satellites; constellation redundancy under 86(3) limits mission-level impact.

  • IMP-0003DenialST0009
    addresses
    high
    direct

    86(3)'s redundancies-of-relevant-components clause (with geographical splitting under (b)) is the operator-side resilience anchor against denial scenarios.

  • IMP-0004DegradationST0009
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Permanent degradation of subsystems requires constellation-level redundancy under 86(3) — the only operator-side mitigation against persistent impairment.

  • IMP-0005DestructionST0009
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Destruction (kinetic or cyber-induced) is mitigated only through redundancy — 86(3)'s redundancies and geographical-splitting clause limits per-strike mission impact.

Built 2026-07-25 from 216 techniques, 334 regulation articles, 125 ENISA controls, 2,610 framework controls, and 90 countermeasures.