The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
Parent: PR.DS
Description
No description available.
Mapped SPARTA techniques
6 techniques
Supported by two independent derivations that agree, neither of them SafeMode's invention. Through NIST 800-53: SafeMode's curated mapping records DE-0002.02 against SI-4 System Monitoring, and CSF 2.0's own crosswalk names that control as an informative reference for PR.DS-01. Through SPARTA: SPARTA's catalog maps DE-0002.02 to countermeasure CM0002 COMSEC, and that countermeasure's own CSF references include PR.DS-01. Recorded as `addresses` rather than `mitigates` because a CSF subcategory states an outcome to be achieved while the underlying control states the mechanism that achieves it, which is the mechanism-versus-mandate ceiling in decisions entry 15.
Supported by two independent derivations that agree, neither of them SafeMode's invention. Through NIST 800-53: SafeMode's curated mapping records EX-0006 against SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity, and CSF 2.0's own crosswalk names that control as an informative reference for PR.DS-01. Through SPARTA: SPARTA's catalog maps EX-0006 to countermeasure CM0002 COMSEC, and that countermeasure's own CSF references include PR.DS-01. Recorded as `addresses` rather than `mitigates` because a CSF subcategory states an outcome to be achieved while the underlying control states the mechanism that achieves it, which is the mechanism-versus-mandate ceiling in decisions entry 15.
Supported by two independent derivations that agree, neither of them SafeMode's invention. Through NIST 800-53: SafeMode's curated mapping records EXF-0004 against SI-4 System Monitoring, and CSF 2.0's own crosswalk names that control as an informative reference for PR.DS-01. Through SPARTA: SPARTA's catalog maps EXF-0004 to countermeasure CM0002 COMSEC; CM0030 Crypto Key Management, and that countermeasure's own CSF references include PR.DS-01. Recorded as `addresses` rather than `mitigates` because a CSF subcategory states an outcome to be achieved while the underlying control states the mechanism that achieves it, which is the mechanism-versus-mandate ceiling in decisions entry 15.
Supported by two independent derivations that agree, neither of them SafeMode's invention. Through NIST 800-53: SafeMode's curated mapping records EXF-0010 against SI-4 System Monitoring, and CSF 2.0's own crosswalk names that control as an informative reference for PR.DS-01. Through SPARTA: SPARTA's catalog maps EXF-0010 to countermeasure CM0002 COMSEC; CM0030 Crypto Key Management, and that countermeasure's own CSF references include PR.DS-01. Recorded as `addresses` rather than `mitigates` because a CSF subcategory states an outcome to be achieved while the underlying control states the mechanism that achieves it, which is the mechanism-versus-mandate ceiling in decisions entry 15.
Supported by two independent derivations that agree, neither of them SafeMode's invention. Through NIST 800-53: SafeMode's curated mapping records IA-0005 against SI-4 System Monitoring, and CSF 2.0's own crosswalk names that control as an informative reference for PR.DS-01. Through SPARTA: SPARTA's catalog maps IA-0005 to countermeasure CM0002 COMSEC, and that countermeasure's own CSF references include PR.DS-01. Recorded as `addresses` rather than `mitigates` because a CSF subcategory states an outcome to be achieved while the underlying control states the mechanism that achieves it, which is the mechanism-versus-mandate ceiling in decisions entry 15.
Supported by two independent derivations that agree, neither of them SafeMode's invention. Through NIST 800-53: SafeMode's curated mapping records REC-0005.04 against SI-4 System Monitoring, and CSF 2.0's own crosswalk names that control as an informative reference for PR.DS-01. Through SPARTA: SPARTA's catalog maps REC-0005.04 to countermeasure CM0002 COMSEC, and that countermeasure's own CSF references include PR.DS-01. Recorded as `addresses` rather than `mitigates` because a CSF subcategory states an outcome to be achieved while the underlying control states the mechanism that achieves it, which is the mechanism-versus-mandate ceiling in decisions entry 15.
Cross-framework references
Relationships published by the source frameworks themselves, reproduced here with attribution. They are not SafeMode Space mappings and carry no confidence rating of ours.
Cite as SafeMode Space, csf-2-0 PR.DS-01.