cra

Annex I, Part I, (2)(h)

Full text: this article's wording is third-party regulatory text. See the official source for the authoritative provision.

Mapped SPARTA techniques (21)

Techniques referencing this article

  • DE-0002Disrupt or Deceive DownlinkST0006
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Denial-based downlink attacks (disabling telemetry links, crashing telemetry software) target the availability of essential monitoring functions, which (2)(h) requires resilience and DoS-mitigation measures for.

  • Disabling telemetry software, corrupting processing pipelines, or crashing display interfaces directly attacks the availability of the ground product's essential monitoring functions.

  • DE-0002.02Jam Link SignalST0006
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    RF jamming itself is environmental and outside CRA's manufacturer scope, but (2)(h) places a positive obligation on the product to maintain availability of essential functions through resilience and DoS mitigation — link-margin design, alternate paths, autonomous-mode fallback partially mitigate jam-induced telemetry loss.

  • AGC tampering blocks legitimate command reception, attacking the availability of the command-and-control function — the resilience obligation in (2)(h).

  • Saturating ingestion and alerting with noisy or adversarial inputs is a denial-of-service / overload condition (2)(h) requires resilience and DoS-mitigation measures against.

  • DE-0010Overflow Audit LogST0006
    addresses
    moderate
    inferred

    CRA Annex I (2)(h) availability is domain-relevant but does not mitigate DE-0010: log/telemetry buffer exhaustion hides activity via rollover while essential functions stay available. The operative controls are protected non-wrapping audit storage and logging-integrity monitoring. Addresses.

  • EX-0010.01RansomwareST0004
    addresses
    high
    derived

    Manufacturer obligation to protect availability of essential and basic functions also after an incident is the recovery-side obligation engaged by ransomware: products must remain operationally recoverable through resilience and mitigation mechanisms.

  • EX-0010.02Wiper MalwareST0004
    addresses
    high
    derived

    Availability-after-incident obligation covers wiper events: products must maintain or recover essential functions even after destructive payloads execute.

  • Availability-after-incident obligation covers safe-mode windows: manufacturers must design products so essential cybersecurity functions remain enforced even in reduced-functionality contingency states.

  • EX-0012.07Propulsion SubsystemST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    derived

    Availability-after-incident obligation covers propulsion-tampering events that compromise safe operation.

  • EX-0012.09Electrical Power SubsystemST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    derived

    Availability obligation covers power-related tampering whose effects directly compromise essential-function availability.

  • EX-0012.11Watchdog Timer (WDT)ST0004
    addresses
    moderate
    derived

    Availability obligation extends to watchdog mechanisms whose disabling allows hung software to persist undetected.

  • EX-0013FloodingST0004
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Availability obligation explicitly references resilience and mitigation against denial-of-service attacks; flooding is the canonical DoS class governed by (2)(h).

  • EX-0013.01Valid CommandsST0004
    addresses
    high
    derived

    Availability obligation covers valid-command flooding; products must absorb or shed legitimate-but-saturating command traffic without losing essential functions.

  • EX-0013.02Erroneous InputST0004
    addresses
    high
    derived

    Availability obligation covers erroneous-input flooding; products must resist parser-saturation through hardened ingress logic and resource controls.

  • Availability obligation covers continued operation under PNT spoofing through fall-back to non-GNSS time/position sources.

  • Manufacturer obligation to protect availability of essential and basic functions also after an incident bounds the exploitation window during safe-mode: products must maintain protection mechanisms even in reduced-functionality states.

  • IMP-0002DisruptionST0009
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Disrupting spacecraft-to-ground communications during critical times is exactly the availability impact (2)(h) requires resilience and DoS-mitigation measures against, including the 'also after an incident' clause.

  • IMP-0003DenialST0009
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Denial — exhausting system resources, degrading subsystems, or blocking communications entirely — is the canonical denial-of-service case (2)(h)'s resilience and DoS-mitigation obligation directly addresses.

  • IMP-0004DegradationST0009
    addresses
    high
    direct

    Permanent impairment of subsystems or hosted payload directly attacks the availability of essential functions; (2)(h)'s resilience obligation includes mitigation against persistent degradation, not only transient DoS.

  • IMP-0005DestructionST0009
    addresses
    moderate
    direct

    Permanent elimination of system use is the most severe availability impact; (2)(h)'s resilience obligation extends to safe-state recovery and mitigation against unrecoverable outcomes.

Built 2026-07-25 from 216 techniques, 334 regulation articles, 125 ENISA controls, 2,610 framework controls, and 90 countermeasures.